Reporting: see where the work actually is
A board tells you the state of the work right now. It's much worse at telling you whether the work is trending the right way. Reporting fills that gap without asking anyone to maintain a spreadsheet on the side.
What you get
- Status breakdown across a workspace or a single project, so a pile-up in review is visible before it becomes a deadline problem.
- Completion over time, to compare this week against the last several rather than against a feeling.
- Workload by assignee, which surfaces the person quietly holding twelve open tasks.
- Overdue and due-soon counts, pulled from the same due dates the board already uses.
Where the numbers come from
Nothing here is a separate data entry step. Every chart reads the tasks your team is already moving around the board, which means reporting is accurate exactly to the degree the board is — and it makes a stale board visible instead of hiding it.
Reporting respects workspace roles. Viewers see reports for the projects they've been added to, not the whole workspace.
A note on interpretation
Charts invite bad conclusions. A spike in completed tasks can mean a productive week or a week of splitting one task into six. We've deliberately kept the view descriptive — counts and trends — rather than scoring people, and we'd rather add context than add a leaderboard.